Frequently Asked Questions

What is RNG?

Renewable Natural Gas is biogas derived from organic sources that has been cleaned to meet pipeline specifications, thus becoming interchangeable with conventional natural gas for all uses.

What are the benefits of RNG?

  • RNG is a carbon neutral energy source that essentially recycles carbon that is already circulating in the environment. Unlike the burning of fossil fuels, which is the release of new carbon emissions that were previously sequestered in the earth, RNG is derived from captured methane that otherwise would be released into the atmosphere.
  • RNG displaces fossil fuel, thus allowing us to rely less on foreign fuel.
  • RNG does not require the growth and harvest of crops for its production.
  • RNG is distributed through the existing infrastructure.
  • RNG production at dairies creates useful, environmentally-friendly byproducts.
  • RNG, when used in the transportation sector, yields up to an 85% reduction in lifecycle GHG emissions in comparison to conventional diesel.

Is there enough renewable natural gas to displace all conventional natural gas?

No. There is, however, enough RNG production potential to displace up to 25% of conventional natural gas.

Is renewable natural gas really renewable?

Although we can take steps to diminish sources (e.g., reduce food waste), organic matter has always, and will always, produce methane as it decomposes. RNG keeps methane out of the atmosphere and instead puts it to a beneficial use.

How much do RNG projects cost relative to other renewable energy options?

RNG projects have varying cost structures depending on a variety of factors, including ultimate use. The costs of developing RNG-to-pipeline projects range from $7.10-$32.60/MMBtu. The costs of developing RNG electricity generation projects are approximately $1,500/kW, which is comparable to other renewable energy sources.

If RNG is primarily composed of methane, and methane is a greenhouse gas, how is capturing and using it good for the environment?

Although methane does not last as long in the atmosphere as carbon dioxide (10 years versus hundreds of years), it is indeed a greenhouse gas that has a higher Global Warming Potential (GWP) than carbon dioxide. Capturing methane at the source (e.g., landfills, farms, and wastewater treatment plants) keeps it from being emitted into the atmosphere. Combusting RNG does create carbon dioxide emissions, but since RNG is derived from plants (which naturally remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere), the carbon dioxide emissions arguably are climate-neutral.

Does injecting RNG into an existing natural gas pipeline further methane concentrations in the atmosphere due to fugitive emissions from a leaking natural gas infrastructure?

There is no doubt that pipelines have been known to leak to some degree. Estimated leakage from the US natural gas infrastructure has been estimated to be 0.38%. Accounting for leakage, the benefits of RNG’s GHG emissions’ reductions would only be diminished by 5%. Additionally, both for financial and environmental reasons, utilities are incentivized to minimize leaks.

Can’t we just divert all organic matter from going to landfills, thus eradicating the need to capture and use methane from them?

Waste is a climate change issue. We waste enough food each year to feed the food insecure many times over. Before a discussion about whether organic matter should be diverted, it first needs to be acknowledged that reducing waste at the source has societal and environmental benefits and should be the first step taken. Thereafter, using organic matter to create compost or for animal feed are viable options, but do not completely negate the need to convert biogas into RNG. Even in Seoul, South Korea, where 95% of food waste is kept out of a landfill, a certain percent of that organic matter stills goes to producing RNG.

Does the production of RNG create more landfills and farms?

Market dynamics of those two industries drive their creation, independent of RNG facilities.

Does RNG allow landfills and farms to greenwash their practices?

Despite the fact that landfills and farms typically operate under strict air and water pollution regulations, there are instances where practices have adversely impacted local communities. The purpose of RNG facilities is not to provide bad actors the opportunity to point to something positive while engaging in behavior that is detrimental to the environment.

Is RNG production counter to the concept of environmental justice?

RNG facilities typically make site hosts more, not less, aware of environmental rules and regulations.

Shouldn’t we just electrify everything and do away with any form of natural gas entirely?

Aside from the fact that this is likely not achievable any time soon, it’s arguably not even advisable given that using RNG to fuel appliances in a typical US home generates fewer GHG emissions on a lifecycle basis compared to a home using all electricity when the grid generating that electricity is over 75% carbon-free.

Is renewable natural gas to conventional natural gas what “clean” coal is to coal?

No. RNG truly is derived exclusively from naturally-occurring, organic sources.

Is RNG a way for companies and utilities to placate environmentalists while still primarily relying on fossil fuel?

Motivations behind the production and use of RNG have no bearing on the science. Aggressively fighting climate change requires us to deploy a diverse range of renewable energy. RNG, and other sources of renewable energy, all have a part to play.